-A ratings that gives a recency bias
-Out of conference schedule strength
-The delta from the first batch of ratings to the last. Kansas State improved by 71 places! Auburn and Florida Atlantic made 61 and 60 spot leaps respectively.
-And an average of all three metrics, unedited, performance and recency.
This was not a good year for the Committee's end product.
I get it, don't get blown out by Iowa (whom I have rated 10th). But to ignore such tangible assets such as "won the conference that scored the best" and "had the hardest out of conference schedule" in favor of something esoteric like "reputation" or hypothetical on-field results just doesn't sit well with me at all.
And Washington in the NY6 just seems like making up the numbers, although that would probably be the case regardless of their choice.
It doesn't terribly mar what was an excellent season, but the decision-making is a little bit of a sour taste in the mouth.
No comments:
Post a Comment